Today's most viewed
Body found at Hampshire bus station
AN INVESTIGATION is under way after a man was found dead at a bus station.
The body was discovered around 11.30pm last night at Gosport Bus Station.
The man was pronounced dead at the scene following the arrival of paramedics who were unable to do anything to help him.
The area was cordoned off by police until around 5am this morning.
Services and ticket sales at the station are said to be as normal this morning.
10:18am Wednesday 16th July 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: Denzil, Chilworth on 10:33am Wed 16 Jul 08
The stentch of fish probably killed him.
The stentch of fish probably killed him.
Posted by: Big Boy, Hythe on 10:59am Wed 16 Jul 08
Stentch? Do you mean stench? Personnally I like the smell of fish. What has that got to do with the story, I am obviously missing something.
Stentch? Do you mean stench? Personnally I like the smell of fish. What has that got to do with the story, I am obviously missing something.
Posted by: Jules, Soton on 11:00am Wed 16 Jul 08
I thought Denzil would be the first contributor to this kind of story. Death seems to get him very excited.
I thought Denzil would be the first contributor to this kind of story. Death seems to get him very excited.
Posted by: hulla, baloo on 11:19am Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Big Boy[/bold] wrote:
Stentch? Do you mean stench? Personnally I like the smell of fish. What has that got to do with the story, I am obviously missing something.[/quote] Personnally?
Do you mean personally?
Big Boy wrote:
Stentch? Do you mean stench? Personnally I like the smell of fish. What has that got to do with the story, I am obviously missing something.
Personnally?
Do you mean personally?
Posted by: Gman, Florida on 11:20am Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Jules[/bold] wrote:
I thought Denzil would be the first contributor to this kind of story. Death seems to get him very excited.[/quote] THe smell reminds him of his Mrs
Jules wrote:
I thought Denzil would be the first contributor to this kind of story. Death seems to get him very excited.
THe smell reminds him of his Mrs
Posted by: Simon on 11:21am Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]hulla[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Big Boy[/bold] wrote: Stentch? Do you mean stench? Personnally I like the smell of fish. What has that got to do with the story, I am obviously missing something.[/quote] Personnally? Do you mean personally?[/quote] Class. Absolutely positively brilliant.
hulla wrote:
Big Boy wrote: Stentch? Do you mean stench? Personnally I like the smell of fish. What has that got to do with the story, I am obviously missing something.
Personnally? Do you mean personally?
Class. Absolutely positively brilliant.
Posted by: Big Boy, Hythe on 11:41am Wed 16 Jul 08
Curses! :-)
Posted by: TT, Soton on 11:45am Wed 16 Jul 08
I think you are forgetting that someone has died! Show some respect!! If you want social networking get a facebook account!!!
I think you are forgetting that someone has died! Show some respect!! If you want social networking get a facebook account!!!
Posted by: Osama Bin Laden, A Cave far far away on 12:02pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]TT[/bold] wrote:
I think you are forgetting that someone has died! Show some respect!! If you want social networking get a facebook account!!![/quote] Denzil barred us
TT wrote:
I think you are forgetting that someone has died! Show some respect!! If you want social networking get a facebook account!!!
Denzil barred us
Posted by: here we go again on 12:03pm Wed 16 Jul 08
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's. if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it, simple as!
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's. if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it, simple as!
Posted by: Twatty Twaddle on 12:05pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]TT[/bold] wrote:
I think you are forgetting that someone has died! Show some respect!! If you want social networking get a facebook account!!![/quote] It's a comment page dumbass.
People are commenting.
Wait until the persons details are released then send flowers.
This isn't a condolence book!
TT wrote:
I think you are forgetting that someone has died! Show some respect!! If you want social networking get a facebook account!!!
It's a comment page dumbass.
People are commenting.
Wait until the persons details are released then send flowers.
This isn't a condolence book!
Posted by: George on 12:06pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as![/quote] IP banning doesn't work
The End
here we go again wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as!
IP banning doesn't work
The End
Posted by: Punctuation Police on 12:08pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]TT[/bold] wrote:
I think you are forgetting that someone has died! Show some respect!! If you want social networking get a facebook account!!![/quote] You're under arrest for crimes against exclaimation marks
TT wrote:
I think you are forgetting that someone has died! Show some respect!! If you want social networking get a facebook account!!!
You're under arrest for crimes against exclaimation marks
Posted by: Where's Wally on 12:09pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's. if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it, simple as![/quote] And your comment was relevant to the story because.....?
here we go again wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's. if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it, simple as!
And your comment was relevant to the story because.....?
Posted by: lu lu, Hampshire on 12:38pm Wed 16 Jul 08
what a bunch of [bold]morons[/bold] !! especially [bold]Big Boy[/bold] and [bold]Denzil[/bold] . A few relevant comments but apart from that very boring.
what a bunch of
morons !! especially
Big Boy and
Denzil . A few relevant comments but apart from that very boring.
Posted by: hulla, baloo on 12:40pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]lu lu[/bold] wrote:
what a bunch of [bold]morons[/bold] !! especially [bold]Big Boy[/bold] and [bold]Denzil[/bold] . A few relevant comments but apart from that very boring. [/quote] and your contribution is.....?
lu lu wrote:
what a bunch of morons !! especially Big Boy and Denzil . A few relevant comments but apart from that very boring.
and your contribution is.....?
Posted by: Yawn on 12:41pm Wed 16 Jul 08
Loads of comments to the tune of "these other comments aren't relevant to the story". Don't you plebs understand that those comments aren't relevant either?
And, no, neither is this one. I'm not here championing the glories of relevance, though
Loads of comments to the tune of "these other comments aren't relevant to the story". Don't you plebs understand that those comments aren't relevant either?
And, no, neither is this one. I'm not here championing the glories of relevance, though
Posted by: Where's Wally on 12:51pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Yawn[/bold] wrote:
Loads of comments to the tune of "these other comments aren't relevant to the story". Don't you plebs understand that those comments aren't relevant either? And, no, neither is this one. I'm not here championing the glories of relevance, though[/quote] here we go again started it!
Yawn wrote:
Loads of comments to the tune of "these other comments aren't relevant to the story". Don't you plebs understand that those comments aren't relevant either? And, no, neither is this one. I'm not here championing the glories of relevance, though
here we go again started it!
Posted by: Yawn on 12:56pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Where's Wally[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Yawn[/bold] wrote:
Loads of comments to the tune of "these other comments aren't relevant to the story". Don't you plebs understand that those comments aren't relevant either? And, no, neither is this one. I'm not here championing the glories of relevance, though[/quote] here we go again started it![/quote] The bas[bold][/bold]stard! Let's get him!
Where's Wally wrote:
Yawn wrote:
Loads of comments to the tune of "these other comments aren't relevant to the story". Don't you plebs understand that those comments aren't relevant either? And, no, neither is this one. I'm not here championing the glories of relevance, though
here we go again started it!
The bas
stard! Let's get him!
Posted by: Bright Spark, Gosport on 1:29pm Wed 16 Jul 08
Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake!
Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake!
Posted by: Joke master on 1:35pm Wed 16 Jul 08
Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball?
He didnt have nobody to go with.
Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball?
He didnt have nobody to go with.
Posted by: Cabbie, Gosport on 1:45pm Wed 16 Jul 08
It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts.
Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?
It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts.
Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?
Posted by: Whatever on 1:49pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Cabbie[/bold] wrote:
It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts. Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?[/quote] Yes, the number 92 is running on time and will not be late today.
Cabbie wrote:
It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts. Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?
Yes, the number 92 is running on time and will not be late today.
Posted by: Osama Bin Laden, A Cave far far away on 1:51pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Whatever[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Cabbie[/bold] wrote:
It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts. Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?[/quote] Yes, the number 92 is running on time and will not be late today.[/quote] And the local chavs have promised not to brick it
Whatever wrote:
Cabbie wrote:
It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts. Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?
Yes, the number 92 is running on time and will not be late today.
And the local chavs have promised not to brick it
Posted by: Yawn on 1:51pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Cabbie[/bold] wrote:
It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts.
Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?[/quote] So once we've got the full facts, it'll be ok to make jokes? Sweet
Cabbie wrote:
It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts.
Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?
So once we've got the full facts, it'll be ok to make jokes? Sweet
Posted by: Lowe and Behold, St Marys hotseat on 1:57pm Wed 16 Jul 08
Poor bloke if only he waited for 5minutes more. then 3 RED BUSES turned up! public transport eh
Poor bloke if only he waited for 5minutes more. then 3 RED BUSES turned up! public transport eh
Posted by: PMSL on 2:05pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Whatever[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Cabbie[/bold] wrote: It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts. Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?[/quote] Yes, the number 92 is running on time and will not be late today.[/quote] I hear its like a cemetary on there thou
Whatever wrote:
Cabbie wrote: It is very harsh commenting on the passing of this poor soul without knowing the full facts. Will the bus company conduct a proper service in his memory?
Yes, the number 92 is running on time and will not be late today.
I hear its like a cemetary on there thou
Posted by: Denzil, Chilworth on 2:28pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Jules[/bold] wrote:
I thought Denzil would be the first contributor to this kind of story. Death seems to get him very excited.[/quote] Only when people from Gosport are concerned.
Jules wrote:
I thought Denzil would be the first contributor to this kind of story. Death seems to get him very excited.
Only when people from Gosport are concerned.
Posted by: J.Lo's Behind You on 2:31pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Bright Spark[/bold] wrote:
Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake![/quote] Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday!
Make up your mind.
Bright Spark wrote:
Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake!
Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday!
Make up your mind.
Posted by: Neville Kneivel on 2:36pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]J.Lo's Behind You[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Bright Spark[/bold] wrote:
Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake![/quote] Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday!
Make up your mind.[/quote] 'Location' means where you [bold]are[/bold], not necessarily where you [bold]live[/bold]
J.Lo's Behind You wrote:
Bright Spark wrote:
Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake!
Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday!
Make up your mind.
'Location' means where you
are, not necessarily where you
livePosted by: Stalker Alert on 2:49pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]J.Lo's Behind You[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Bright Spark[/bold] wrote: Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake![/quote] Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday! Make up your mind.[/quote] Hello stalker.
J.Lo's Behind You wrote:
Bright Spark wrote: Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake!
Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday! Make up your mind.
Hello stalker.
Posted by: John Stalker, on t' telly on 2:56pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Stalker Alert[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]J.Lo's Behind You[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Bright Spark[/bold] wrote: Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake![/quote] Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday! Make up your mind.[/quote] Hello stalker.[/quote] You called? Did you want to buy one of my endorsed garage doors? They really do give peace of mind
Stalker Alert wrote:
J.Lo's Behind You wrote:
Bright Spark wrote: Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake!
Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday! Make up your mind.
Hello stalker.
You called? Did you want to buy one of my endorsed garage doors? They really do give peace of mind
Posted by: SafeStyle Windows Man, its me again on 2:59pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[bold]I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE[/bold]
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE
I SAID YOU BUY ONE AND YOU GET ONE FREE Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 3:02pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as![/quote] IP banning doesn't work
The End[/quote] Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts!
George wrote:
here we go again wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as!
IP banning doesn't work
The End
Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts!
Posted by: Denzil, wid da madems on 3:06pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote: why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's. if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it, simple as![/quote] IP banning doesn't work The End[/quote] Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts![/quote] Mac address, does that come with fries?
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote: here we go again wrote: why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's. if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it, simple as!
IP banning doesn't work The End
Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts!
Mac address, does that come with fries?
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 3:07pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote:
Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball?
He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line?
If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Joke master wrote:
Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball?
He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line?
If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 3:07pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Denzil[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote: why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's. if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it, simple as![/quote] IP banning doesn't work The End[/quote] Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts![/quote] Mac address, does that come with fries?[/quote] Ha ha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha ha
Denzil wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote: here we go again wrote: why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's. if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it, simple as!
IP banning doesn't work The End
Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts!
Mac address, does that come with fries?
Ha ha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha haha ha ha ha ha
Posted by: George on 3:10pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as![/quote] IP banning doesn't work
The End[/quote] Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts![/quote] Not viable, and not reliable either. Plus, erm, [bold]what[/bold] account?
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
here we go again wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as!
IP banning doesn't work
The End
Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts!
Not viable, and not reliable either. Plus, erm,
what account?
Posted by: Joke master on 3:11pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story.
Why did the skelton not attend the dance?
he didnt have no-body to go with.
HTH
The Watchman wrote:
Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story.
Why did the skelton not attend the dance?
he didnt have no-body to go with.
HTH
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 3:13pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as![/quote] IP banning doesn't work
The End[/quote] Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts![/quote] Not viable, and not reliable either. Plus, erm, [bold]what[/bold] account?[/quote] Their name and location never changes. They obviously created an account with the echo so they don't have to type in a name and location every time they post a comment (see the link at the bottom of the page).
Plus (apart from them logging in from a different location each time they visit the site) how is blocking a mac address not viable or reliable?
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
here we go again wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as!
IP banning doesn't work
The End
Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts!
Not viable, and not reliable either. Plus, erm, what account?
Their name and location never changes. They obviously created an account with the echo so they don't have to type in a name and location every time they post a comment (see the link at the bottom of the page).
Plus (apart from them logging in from a different location each time they visit the site) how is blocking a mac address not viable or reliable?
Posted by: J.Lo's Behind You on 3:13pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Stalker Alert[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]J.Lo's Behind You[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Bright Spark[/bold] wrote: Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake![/quote] Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday! Make up your mind.[/quote] Hello stalker.[/quote] Who's a stalker and who are they stalking???
Stalker Alert wrote:
J.Lo's Behind You wrote: Bright Spark wrote: Just how long had he been waiting for a bus for God's sake!
Hey, you lived in Stubbington yesterday! Make up your mind.
Hello stalker.
Who's a stalker and who are they stalking???
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 3:14pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story.
Why did the skelton not attend the dance?
he didnt have no-body to go with.
HTH[/quote] OK. Still have a double negative in there. Keep trying.
Joke master wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story.
Why did the skelton not attend the dance?
he didnt have no-body to go with.
HTH
OK. Still have a double negative in there. Keep trying.
Posted by: hulla, baloo on 3:18pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH[/quote] Whilst it may have been a joke, an old and cr-p one at that, it gets lost in the use of double negatives.
Joke master wrote:
The Watchman wrote: Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH
Whilst it may have been a joke, an old and cr-p one at that, it gets lost in the use of double negatives.
Posted by: George on 3:27pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as![/quote] IP banning doesn't work
The End[/quote] Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts![/quote] Not viable, and not reliable either. Plus, erm, [bold]what[/bold] account?[/quote] Their name and location never changes. They obviously created an account with the echo so they don't have to type in a name and location every time they post a comment (see the link at the bottom of the page).
Plus (apart from them logging in from a different location each time they visit the site) how is blocking a mac address not viable or reliable?[/quote] That, or they - like I - use the "form completion" feature of their web browser to remember their name. Do you have an account?
Why is mac filtering not viable? Well, aside from the fact that mac addresses can quite easily be spoofed at source, they're susceptible to the same tricks as IP addresses. It's not hard to use an anonymous proxy, in another country (there are millions of 'em) so the IP logs become worthless in that respect. For example, if you were to trace my IP address when I'm at home, you'd probably find out that I was posting from somewhere halfway around the world. I'm not, but that's what the logs would tell you. The logs will show the IP address and the MAC address of where the request last came from, which is not necessarily where it originated. Similarly, I'm at work at the moment, so the IP and MAC address being logged is that of our HTTP proxy, [bold]not[/bold] my machine. It's a pain, really.
The only thing that can be done is, force people to sign up for an account, and pay for it by credit/debit. That would limit how many accounts they could have, and when they're all blocked, they have to go open a new bank account to get another one. Who's going to bother? But then, not too many people will want to put their card details into a website just to voice an opinion on some local news, and the cost of setting up the system is prohibitive for a local newspaper. It ain't gonna happen. We just have to live with trolls
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
here we go again wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as!
IP banning doesn't work
The End
Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts!
Not viable, and not reliable either. Plus, erm, what account?
Their name and location never changes. They obviously created an account with the echo so they don't have to type in a name and location every time they post a comment (see the link at the bottom of the page).
Plus (apart from them logging in from a different location each time they visit the site) how is blocking a mac address not viable or reliable?
That, or they - like I - use the "form completion" feature of their web browser to remember their name. Do you have an account?
Why is mac filtering not viable? Well, aside from the fact that mac addresses can quite easily be spoofed at source, they're susceptible to the same tricks as IP addresses. It's not hard to use an anonymous proxy, in another country (there are millions of 'em) so the IP logs become worthless in that respect. For example, if you were to trace my IP address when I'm at home, you'd probably find out that I was posting from somewhere halfway around the world. I'm not, but that's what the logs would tell you. The logs will show the IP address and the MAC address of where the request last came from, which is not necessarily where it originated. Similarly, I'm at work at the moment, so the IP and MAC address being logged is that of our HTTP proxy,
not my machine. It's a pain, really.
The only thing that can be done is, force people to sign up for an account, and pay for it by credit/debit. That would limit how many accounts they could have, and when they're all blocked, they have to go open a new bank account to get another one. Who's going to bother? But then, not too many people will want to put their card details into a website just to voice an opinion on some local news, and the cost of setting up the system is prohibitive for a local newspaper. It ain't gonna happen. We just have to live with trolls
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 3:35pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]here we go again[/bold] wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as![/quote] IP banning doesn't work
The End[/quote] Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts![/quote] Not viable, and not reliable either. Plus, erm, [bold]what[/bold] account?[/quote] Their name and location never changes. They obviously created an account with the echo so they don't have to type in a name and location every time they post a comment (see the link at the bottom of the page).
Plus (apart from them logging in from a different location each time they visit the site) how is blocking a mac address not viable or reliable?[/quote] That, or they - like I - use the "form completion" feature of their web browser to remember their name. Do you have an account?
Why is mac filtering not viable? Well, aside from the fact that mac addresses can quite easily be spoofed at source, they're susceptible to the same tricks as IP addresses. It's not hard to use an anonymous proxy, in another country (there are millions of 'em) so the IP logs become worthless in that respect. For example, if you were to trace my IP address when I'm at home, you'd probably find out that I was posting from somewhere halfway around the world. I'm not, but that's what the logs would tell you. The logs will show the IP address and the MAC address of where the request last came from, which is not necessarily where it originated. Similarly, I'm at work at the moment, so the IP and MAC address being logged is that of our HTTP proxy, [bold]not[/bold] my machine. It's a pain, really.
The only thing that can be done is, force people to sign up for an account, and pay for it by credit/debit. That would limit how many accounts they could have, and when they're all blocked, they have to go open a new bank account to get another one. Who's going to bother? But then, not too many people will want to put their card details into a website just to voice an opinion on some local news, and the cost of setting up the system is prohibitive for a local newspaper. It ain't gonna happen. We just have to live with trolls[/quote] Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
here we go again wrote:
why the echo let them on here is beyond me. they should ban their ip's.
if you have nothing relevant about the story to say, then don't say it,
simple as!
IP banning doesn't work
The End
Fine. So ban them by mac address. That works! And delete their accounts!
Not viable, and not reliable either. Plus, erm, what account?
Their name and location never changes. They obviously created an account with the echo so they don't have to type in a name and location every time they post a comment (see the link at the bottom of the page).
Plus (apart from them logging in from a different location each time they visit the site) how is blocking a mac address not viable or reliable?
That, or they - like I - use the "form completion" feature of their web browser to remember their name. Do you have an account?
Why is mac filtering not viable? Well, aside from the fact that mac addresses can quite easily be spoofed at source, they're susceptible to the same tricks as IP addresses. It's not hard to use an anonymous proxy, in another country (there are millions of 'em) so the IP logs become worthless in that respect. For example, if you were to trace my IP address when I'm at home, you'd probably find out that I was posting from somewhere halfway around the world. I'm not, but that's what the logs would tell you. The logs will show the IP address and the MAC address of where the request last came from, which is not necessarily where it originated. Similarly, I'm at work at the moment, so the IP and MAC address being logged is that of our HTTP proxy, not my machine. It's a pain, really.
The only thing that can be done is, force people to sign up for an account, and pay for it by credit/debit. That would limit how many accounts they could have, and when they're all blocked, they have to go open a new bank account to get another one. Who's going to bother? But then, not too many people will want to put their card details into a website just to voice an opinion on some local news, and the cost of setting up the system is prohibitive for a local newspaper. It ain't gonna happen. We just have to live with trolls
Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Posted by: Joke Master's Master on 3:39pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH[/quote] Sigh.
Why did the skeleton not attend the dance?
He had no body to go with.
Joke master wrote:
The Watchman wrote: Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH
Sigh.
Why did the skeleton not attend the dance?
He had no body to go with.
Posted by: Joke man on 3:40pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH[/quote] OK. Still have a double negative in there. Keep trying.[/quote] I love to hate you.
The Watchman wrote:
Joke master wrote: The Watchman wrote: Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH
OK. Still have a double negative in there. Keep trying.
I love to hate you.
Posted by: ha ha ha on 3:46pm Wed 16 Jul 08
didn't he realise that bus servic es out of gosport packed up years ago? He might still be alive now if he'd known.
And I don't bl**dy care if this comment is pointless and irrelevant, i'm bored.
didn't he realise that bus servic es out of gosport packed up years ago? He might still be alive now if he'd known.
And I don't bl**dy care if this comment is pointless and irrelevant, i'm bored.
Posted by: pedant on 3:49pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH[/quote] FFS you retard,
it's:
why didn't the skelEton go to the dance?
Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with.
If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point
Joke master wrote:
The Watchman wrote: Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH
FFS you retard,
it's:
why didn't the skelEton go to the dance?
Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with.
If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point
Posted by: George on 3:54pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote]
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 4:05pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote]
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet[/quote] No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
George wrote:
Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
Posted by: George on 4:10pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote]
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet[/quote] No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.[/quote] Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it
Beans? J2EE developer, are we?
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it
Beans? J2EE developer, are we?
Posted by: Joke Master on 4:15pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]pedant[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH[/quote] FFS you retard, it's: why didn't the skelEton go to the dance? Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with. If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point [/quote] You must be a very lonely person.
Also you are probably bald.
pedant wrote:
Joke master wrote: The Watchman wrote: Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH
FFS you retard, it's: why didn't the skelEton go to the dance? Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with. If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point
You must be a very lonely person.
Also you are probably bald.
Posted by: Yul Brynner on 4:16pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Joke Master[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]pedant[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH[/quote] FFS you retard, it's: why didn't the skelEton go to the dance? Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with. If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point [/quote] You must be a very lonely person.
Also you are probably bald. [/quote] So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money [bold]and[/bold] I've shagged loads more birds than you
Joke Master wrote:
pedant wrote:
Joke master wrote: The Watchman wrote: Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH
FFS you retard, it's: why didn't the skelEton go to the dance? Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with. If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point
You must be a very lonely person.
Also you are probably bald.
So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money
and I've shagged loads more birds than you
Posted by: Slap Ed, Southampton on 4:22pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Yul Brynner[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke Master[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]pedant[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH[/quote] FFS you retard, it's: why didn't the skelEton go to the dance? Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with. If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point [/quote] You must be a very lonely person.
Also you are probably bald. [/quote] So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money [bold]and[/bold] I've shagged loads more birds than you[/quote] I thought Yul Brynner was dead so he couldn't have gone to the dance either. As for shagging lots of birds... in his dreams maybe.
Yul Brynner wrote:
Joke Master wrote:
pedant wrote:
Joke master wrote: The Watchman wrote: Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH
FFS you retard, it's: why didn't the skelEton go to the dance? Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with. If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point
You must be a very lonely person.
Also you are probably bald.
So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money and I've shagged loads more birds than you
I thought Yul Brynner was dead so he couldn't have gone to the dance either. As for shagging lots of birds... in his dreams maybe.
Posted by: Jokemaster on 4:26pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote]So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money and I've shagged loads more birds than you[/quote]
Bald and small people have nothing better to do than pick up on other peoples mistakes, they are striving for perfection in a hairless world.
You have only slept with more "birds" as you have a bigger family than me, millbrook scum.
So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money and I've shagged loads more birds than you
Bald and small people have nothing better to do than pick up on other peoples mistakes, they are striving for perfection in a hairless world.
You have only slept with more "birds" as you have a bigger family than me, millbrook scum.
Posted by: Yul Brynner on 4:29pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Slap Ed[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Yul Brynner[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke Master[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]pedant[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Joke master[/bold] wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.[/quote] whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense [/quote] Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH[/quote] FFS you retard, it's: why didn't the skelEton go to the dance? Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with. If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point [/quote] You must be a very lonely person.
Also you are probably bald. [/quote] So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money [bold]and[/bold] I've shagged loads more birds than you[/quote] I thought Yul Brynner was dead so he couldn't have gone to the dance either. As for shagging lots of birds... in his dreams maybe.[/quote] So the real reason the skeleton couldn't go to the dance was actually "because he's dead"?
No soap, radio?
Slap Ed wrote:
Yul Brynner wrote:
Joke Master wrote:
pedant wrote:
Joke master wrote: The Watchman wrote: Joke master wrote: Why didnt the Skelton go to the ball? He didnt have nobody to go with.
whilst I appreciate that my comment will have nothing to do with this article and the 'Blog Police' will probably complain, I have to ask: Did you mean to have a double negative in the punch line? If so, that makes absolutely no sense
Its a joke, not a real life story. Why did the skelton not attend the dance? he didnt have no-body to go with. HTH
FFS you retard, it's: why didn't the skelEton go to the dance? Because he didn't have ANYbody to go with. If you're going to tell jokes, f**king get them right or you lose the point
You must be a very lonely person.
Also you are probably bald.
So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money and I've shagged loads more birds than you
I thought Yul Brynner was dead so he couldn't have gone to the dance either. As for shagging lots of birds... in his dreams maybe.
So the real reason the skeleton couldn't go to the dance was actually "because he's dead"?
No soap, radio?
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 4:29pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote]
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet[/quote] No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.[/quote] Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it
Beans? J2EE developer, are we?[/quote] Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it!
what do you develop in then?
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it
Beans? J2EE developer, are we?
Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it!
what do you develop in then?
Posted by: Yul Brynner on 4:32pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Jokemaster[/bold] wrote:
[quote]So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money and I've shagged loads more birds than you[/quote]
Bald and small people have nothing better to do than pick up on other peoples mistakes, they are striving for perfection in a hairless world.
You have only slept with more "birds" as you have a bigger family than me, millbrook scum. [/quote] Oh dear oh dear oh dear! Despite labelling yourself as "Jokemaster", it appears you've had a complete sense-of-humour-otom
y (or ectomy, whichever's funnier. I forget which is which). Here you are, picking fights with someone who's picking holes in your own attempts at being funny, and then picking fights with anyone else who has their own attempts at being funny.
It's a joke, numpty. Yul Brynner hasn't really come back from the dead to have a pop at you.
Jokemaster my ar[bold][/bold]se. You're fired
Jokemaster wrote:
So what? I'm bald, and I've got loads and loads of money and I've shagged loads more birds than you
Bald and small people have nothing better to do than pick up on other peoples mistakes, they are striving for perfection in a hairless world.
You have only slept with more "birds" as you have a bigger family than me, millbrook scum.
Oh dear oh dear oh dear! Despite labelling yourself as "Jokemaster", it appears you've had a complete sense-of-humour-otom
y (or ectomy, whichever's funnier. I forget which is which). Here you are, picking fights with someone who's picking holes in your own attempts at being funny, and then picking fights with anyone else who has their own attempts at being funny.
It's a joke, numpty. Yul Brynner hasn't really come back from the dead to have a pop at you.
Jokemaster my ar
se. You're fired
Posted by: George on 4:37pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote]
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet[/quote] No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.[/quote] Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it
Beans? J2EE developer, are we?[/quote] Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it!
what do you develop in then?[/quote] It can still be spoofed, quite easily. Seriously, it can. HTTP sessions as you see them might very well contain the real addresses, because why would you want to fool something you're trying to buy from? But if you want to be anonymous on the Internet, it's always possible. Always
Me? I'm currently all caught up in the POJO revolution, but I was a 'C' hacker for years
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it
Beans? J2EE developer, are we?
Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it!
what do you develop in then?
It can still be spoofed, quite easily. Seriously, it can. HTTP sessions as you see them might very well contain the real addresses, because why would you want to fool something you're trying to buy from? But if you want to be anonymous on the Internet, it's always possible. Always
Me? I'm currently all caught up in the POJO revolution, but I was a 'C' hacker for years
Posted by: George on 4:38pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote: [quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote] Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet[/quote] No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.[/quote] Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it Beans? J2EE developer, are we?[/quote] Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it! what do you develop in then?[/quote] Wiggly poo, ISOSM, BOMBD, FUKD, ESPN, Puff Pastry Hangman, Custard Ganit, Quadra Spazzed on a life glug, Cake, Jessop Jessop, Clarky Car, the horse.
Just to name a few, wibble.
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote: The Watchman wrote: George wrote: Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it Beans? J2EE developer, are we?
Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it! what do you develop in then?
Wiggly poo, ISOSM, BOMBD, FUKD, ESPN, Puff Pastry Hangman, Custard Ganit, Quadra Spazzed on a life glug, Cake, Jessop Jessop, Clarky Car, the horse.
Just to name a few, wibble.
Posted by: Denzil, Chilworth on 4:40pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote: [quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote] Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet[/quote] No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.[/quote] Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it Beans? J2EE developer, are we?[/quote] Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it! what do you develop in then?[/quote] It can still be spoofed, quite easily. Seriously, it can. HTTP sessions as you see them might very well contain the real addresses, because why would you want to fool something you're trying to buy from? But if you want to be anonymous on the Internet, it's always possible. Always Me? I'm currently all caught up in the POJO revolution, but I was a 'C' hacker for years[/quote] Aka, a Nerd.
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote: George wrote: The Watchman wrote: George wrote: Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it Beans? J2EE developer, are we?
Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it! what do you develop in then?
It can still be spoofed, quite easily. Seriously, it can. HTTP sessions as you see them might very well contain the real addresses, because why would you want to fool something you're trying to buy from? But if you want to be anonymous on the Internet, it's always possible. Always Me? I'm currently all caught up in the POJO revolution, but I was a 'C' hacker for years
Aka, a Nerd.
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 4:41pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote]
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet[/quote] No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.[/quote] Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it
Beans? J2EE developer, are we?[/quote] Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it!
what do you develop in then?[/quote] It can still be spoofed, quite easily. Seriously, it can. HTTP sessions as you see them might very well contain the real addresses, because why would you want to fool something you're trying to buy from? But if you want to be anonymous on the Internet, it's always possible. Always
Me? I'm currently all caught up in the POJO revolution, but I was a 'C' hacker for years[/quote] Cool. I totally agree that the address can be spoofed I just don't think they are capable of it :P
Still this was a good way of avoiding fixing legacy systems for an afternoon :D
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
George wrote:
Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it
Beans? J2EE developer, are we?
Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it!
what do you develop in then?
It can still be spoofed, quite easily. Seriously, it can. HTTP sessions as you see them might very well contain the real addresses, because why would you want to fool something you're trying to buy from? But if you want to be anonymous on the Internet, it's always possible. Always
Me? I'm currently all caught up in the POJO revolution, but I was a 'C' hacker for years
Cool. I totally agree that the address can be spoofed I just don't think they are capable of it :P
Still this was a good way of avoiding fixing legacy systems for an afternoon :D
Posted by: The Watchman, The Ether on 4:44pm Wed 16 Jul 08
[quote][bold]Denzil[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]The Watchman[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]George[/bold] wrote: [quote]Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P[/quote] Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet[/quote] No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.[/quote] Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it Beans? J2EE developer, are we?[/quote] Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it! what do you develop in then?[/quote] It can still be spoofed, quite easily. Seriously, it can. HTTP sessions as you see them might very well contain the real addresses, because why would you want to fool something you're trying to buy from? But if you want to be anonymous on the Internet, it's always possible. Always Me? I'm currently all caught up in the POJO revolution, but I was a 'C' hacker for years[/quote] Aka, a Nerd.[/quote] Poor poor denzil. Don't you realise that nerds rule the world and probably pay your wages in some way or another?
Do you think that the computer you are using right now was developed by someone who isn't a nerd?
Denzil wrote:
George wrote:
The Watchman wrote: George wrote: The Watchman wrote: George wrote: Very true. But in blocking the connection (ie the dsl line) they are logging in with, they could at least stop them from posting messages. The mac address you are assigned by your ISP never changes and if they are logging in from work at least their boss can give them a good kicking for having them banned from the echo website :P
Fundamental misunderstanding of Internetworking, I think, Watchman. There isn't a direct connection between your PC and the website you're browsing. You can't look at IP logs, or even examine incoming raw packets, and establish where they're coming from. The best you can do is see where the last proxy the request went through was, approach the owner and ask for the incoming logs. They're not obliged to comply, and in the case of anonymous proxies, they'll generally be in countries where the UK has no jurisdiction, run by organisations that won't give a hoot about your problem and will stand in your way just for the fun of it. That's what they're there for: to keep you anonymous on the Internet
No but you can use beans to return information about the users session which includes their public ip and mac address then return that information to the server.
Erm, no you can't. Trust me, there's no reliable way to do it Beans? J2EE developer, are we?
Developer period. There are methods of doing this in asp, php, coldfusion, java, perl, you name it! what do you develop in then?
It can still be spoofed, quite easily. Seriously, it can. HTTP sessions as you see them might very well contain the real addresses, because why would you want to fool something you're trying to buy from? But if you want to be anonymous on the Internet, it's always possible. Always Me? I'm currently all caught up in the POJO revolution, but I was a 'C' hacker for years
Aka, a Nerd.
Poor poor denzil. Don't you realise that nerds rule the world and probably pay your wages in some way or another?
Do you think that the computer you are using right now was developed by someone who isn't a nerd?
Posted by: Denzil, Chilworth on 4:55pm Wed 16 Jul 08
FAO George, nerds may rule the world, but a nerd is a nerd.
FAO George, nerds may rule the world, but a nerd is a nerd.
Posted by: George on 4:57pm Wed 16 Jul 08
Of course I'm a nerd, Denzil! Was that supposed to be an insult? I get paid a relative fortune for doing a job I both find pretty easy [bold]and[/bold] actually enjoy. I work pretty much whatever hours I feel like, nobody complains if I take an afternoon off to go to the pub now and again. Then I go home, and I'm just like everyone else, a normal guy, with a normal life, only my income is considerably higher than the national average, and I don't dread going back to work again. If I get bored with a job, or want more money, or get made redundant (all of whi
