Home page
Latest News
District News
New Forest Post
Features
News Briefing
Education
Crime Watch
Travel latest
Campaigns
Shipping
Charity News
Regional
National News
National Video News
Hampshire Facts
Readers' Letters
Local Elections 2008
Royal Pier & Casino
Brambridge Murder
Woolston Riverside
Fluoride Debate
Ballot
Video archive
Downloads
Twitter
New Forest Show
Polski Glos
Wave 105
Radio Hampshire
True Crime Files
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
News Briefing
Councillors take £1.27m in expenses

THE taxpayers' bill for Hampshire county councillors has doubled in past seven years, the Daily Echo can reveal.

Allowances claimed by the council's 78 members totalled £1.278m last year, with an additional £110,000 paid out in expenses.

More than half of the county councillors claimed even more for their roles on other councils and public authorities.

Two county councillors pocketed more than £50,000 in their various allowances and expenses.

Council tax reform group IsItFair said the cost of the allowances was too high and questioned whether some councillors were value for money.

IsItFair founder Christine Melsom said: "The total bill is horrendous. It's toomuch for people to be spending on a council."

The figures come as an independent panel, carrying out the first full review of the county council's allowance scheme since it was set up eight years ago, begins to consider evidence it has received over the past month.

Councillors want to know whether they are being paid enough for their work and will get a report back in October, although they can ignore the recommendations.

County councillors can currently claim a basic allowance of £11,565 with extra allowances for special responsibilities, rising to £27,913 for the leader, Tory councillor Ken Thornber.

Yet many councillors are so called "double hatters" claiming extra sets of allowances for other public roles while in some cases holding down jobs as well.

Top of the pile is Tory councillor Mel Kendal who claimed a total of £60,958 for his job as Cabinet member for environment and his role as leader of New Forest District Council and the national park authority, while also running a business as an investment consultant.

Lib Dem councillor Keith House, who is a fulltime politician, claimed £54,092 for his role shadowing Cllr Kendal on the county council, for being leader of Eastleigh Borough Council, a member of the Hampshire Fire and Rescue Authority and SEEDA, the regional development agency.

IsItFair campaigner Rosemary Conway, who submitted evidence to the pay panel, said: "Some of these may well be estimable people. But clearly, even if they are workaholics, arithmetic shows a full-time employee cannot really be putting in more than a limited quota of hours on their council work."

Cllr Thornber said the workload of a county councillor should be about two or three days a week while a being Cabinet member was a "full-time job".

He said Cllr Kendal fulfilled his dual roles with "great difficulty"

and that he had discussed the issue with him, although refused to comment further.

"The only saving grace is many district councils do their work in the evening," Cllr Thornber said.

He said there were occasions when the dual responsibilities were in conflict.

"I've made it clear all along. The fewer double hatters the better,"

he said.

Cllr Thornber said his Tory administration was not seeking any increases in allowances for the "foreseeable future" and said most councillors were value for money.

"There are some members who give extremely good value for money.

There are some councillors who, as expected in any large organisation, only put in nominal appearances, but I think it's a minority."

IsItFair is calling for councillors to fully account for the work they actually do.

Cllr Thornber said he would prefer a return to allowances for attendances, which were scrapped under a shake-up of local government in 2000.

The move saw the allowance bill for county councillors rocket by more than 60 per cent the following year to £632,000.

The three-man remuneration panel will compare Hampshire, the third largest shire council in the country, to similar authorities as well as the private sector.

The review will also look at councillors' hours of work, levels of responsibility, and whether allowances should increase to attract younger and more ethnically diverse councillors.

Lib Dem councillor SamPayne, 25, the youngest on the authority, has argued her council work prevented her from being able to hold a part-time job and the present allowance on its own made it impossible to get a mortgage.

But Mrs Melsom said allowances, which are more than many full-time workers get paid, should not be regarded as an alternative income for jobless councillors.

She told the pay panel: "We cannot realistically expect that the council should reflect every age group and minority group, nor would this necessarily be desirable.

"Any move toward regarding it as obligatory to have such a composition, we would see as dangerously politically correct, and motivated by this wish to justify raising allowances."

Cllr Thornber said allowances were unlikely to be an incentive to attract younger candidates in the middle of their careers.

"We try to attract people who have finished their careers and are still active," added Cllr Thornber.

Councillors agreed in February to link their pay rise this year to the national pay award for staff.

That is still undecided after unions voted for a two-day walkout later this month in rejection of a 2.45 per cent rise.

Cllr Thornber said: "We are quite content to take whatever local Government employees are taking."

Southampton City Council is yet to publish its allowances.

  • Read more today's Daily Echo

    11:03am Thursday 3rd July 2008

    Print   Email this   Comment
    Posted by: Bill, Nomortgage-ville on 3:37pm Wed 2 Jul 08
    Lib Dem councillor SamPayne, 25, the youngest on the authority, has argued her council work prevented her from being able to hold a part-time job and the present allowance on its own made it impossible to get a mortgage.

    I suggest that she quit her position as councillor and get a full time job, so that she can get a mortgage.
    Posted by: Mugabe on 5:01pm Wed 2 Jul 08
    The price of democracy? lol.

    We are not a democracy.
    Posted by: Christine Melsom Isitfair on 8:20pm Wed 2 Jul 08
    'Councillors want to know whether they are being paid enough for their work'
    More to the point, are they being paid too much?
    Posted by: Derek, Dibden Purlieu on 10:01pm Wed 2 Jul 08
    "I've made it clear all along. The fewer double hatters the better,"

    ....says two faced Thornber who has two hats himself. Why does this man find the truth so difficult to tell?
    Posted by: Christine Melsom Isitfair, Hampshire on 10:34pm Wed 2 Jul 08
    Derek can You please tell me which other hat Councillor Thornber wears? I know he is the Leader but what is the other one?
    Posted by: watcher on 11:07pm Wed 2 Jul 08
    Christine Melsom Isitfair wrote:
    Derek can You please tell me which other hat Councillor Thornber wears? I know he is the Leader but what is the other one?
    If he doesn't now, he certainly has in the past, looking at his CV. Besides, Thornber heads the council, so why allow these "double hatters"?

    Sean Woodward's another one. Council leadership, county councillor, PUSH, HPA, Hamble, more committee memberships than you can throw a stick at, full time employment, a healthcare business, and a healthy property portfolio. How does HE manage to fit all that in?
    Posted by: Christine Melsom Isitfair, Hampshire on 10:15am Thu 3 Jul 08
    As Councillor Thornber says,the Cabinet style of Local Government is not his choice, and we all know what happened to allowances when it was introduced.
    About half of the Councillors in Hampshire County Council are 'double hatters'.If
    Councillor Thornber agrees that allowances are not meant to be a substitute for salaries, unfortunately the Government might not be of the same opinion: there are rumours (well founded) that 'salaries' will be introduced into local government. With these, can we expect our councillors to no longer sing in the choir? Will they demand prima donna status as do MPs? I would have thought that a basic allowance of nearly £12,000, plus pension rights, plus expenses was ample. After all, as long as they attend at least one meeting every six months, their knuckles will not be rapped too hard.
    Councillors should be accountable to their electorate, details of what they do or don't do,including hours spent representing their voters, should be in their profile, and payment made accordingly.
    Posted by: watcher on 4:10pm Thu 3 Jul 08
    Twelve grand for three hours' paper shuffling, nods and harumphings? Blimey! Sign me up today!
    Posted by: verdantbear, southamptonwoods on 5:16pm Thu 3 Jul 08
    what about the expenses of our lovely southampton powers that be ? both councillors and heads of department can we discover their excesses (sorry expenses) ???
    Posted by: Christine Melsom Isitfair, Hampshire on 9:07am Fri 4 Jul 08
    I suggest you have a stiff scotch before you look. http://www.southampt
    on.gov.uk/thecouncil
    /thecouncil/organisa
    tion/city-councillor
    s/members-allowances
    .asp
    Copy and paste the above. It seems the latest on this site are for 2006/2007

    If you don't like what you see join the campaign www.isitfair.co.uk
    Add your comment
    Name:
    Email: *
    Location:
    **
    Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
     
     e.g. 123-123
    Comment:
    Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
    Format Text:

     
    By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
    * Your email address will not be displayed
    ** To avoid register now or login
    Archive
  • The Daily Echo brings you 1000s of jobs , homes and cars every day
    Powered by Powered by Fish4


    Terms & Conditions
    Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
    Newsquest Media Group
    A Gannett Company
    This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network