Home page
Latest News
District News
New Forest Post
Features
News Briefing
Education
Crime Watch
Travel latest
Campaigns
Beat the Crunch
Parking Mad
Knives off our streets
Green Watch
Last Orders for Glass
Carer of the Year
Give us a Spitfire
Justice for carers
Respect the Ref
Save a Life
Keep Kids Sober
Keep Them Safe
Stop The Silent Calls
Shipping
Charity News
Regional
National News
National Video News
Hampshire Facts
Readers' Letters
Local Elections 2008
Royal Pier & Casino
Brambridge Murder
Woolston Riverside
Fluoride Debate
Ballot
Video archive
Downloads
Twitter
New Forest Show
Polski Glos
Wave 105
Radio Hampshire
True Crime Files
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Parking Mad  RSS Feed RSS feed | About
Motoring group backs Echo's parking campaign
Belinda Rouse
Belinda Rouse

A LEADING motoring organisation has condemned moves by Southampton City Council to charge residents to park outside their homes.

City council leaders agreed the controversial policy to start charging for first permits without guaranteeing space.

The charging policy has sparked outrage from residents and led to the Daily Echo's Parking Mad campaign demanding a U-turn.

Now a survey has revealed other Hampshire authorities that run large scale free residents parking schemes are resisting the move.

Hugh Bladon, a spokesman for The Association for British Drivers said: "If you pay council tax for a property you should be entitled to a permit to park your car on the road.

"I don't see why anybody should be made to pay for a permit. You don't get much for council tax as it is.

"If somebody asked me to pay for a permit I would be furious."

Southampton's joint Labour and Lib Dem administration has ruled out bringing in new charges for at least 12 months but have refused to scrap the policy.

They want to make the residents parking scheme "self-funding".

A spokesman for Portsmouth City Council said it initially charged for permits for its residents parking scheme when introduced in 1999. But it ditched the charges as the scheme expanded and they proved unpopular.

"When we started to spread it around the city it was clear it wasn't going to work that way," the spokesman said.

"We asked residents and that's what they wanted."

The spokesman said there were no plans to introduce charges for first permits, although second permits cost £50.

E a s t l e i g h B o r o u g h Council, whose 25-year-old residents parking scheme now covers 4,000 homes, also gives free first permits.

"We recognise that many households in Eastleigh may need a car to get around and to work and don't penalise them for that," a spokesman said.

He added a £30 charge for a second permitted was intended to reflect administration costs and encourage the use of public transport.

Councils in the New Forest and Fareham that charge for all permits operate limited schemes.

Winchester started charging for permits when it launched its scheme in response to the problem of student parking.

Belinda Rounce, marketing assistant, 24, of Liverpool Street, Southampton is angry at the parking policy: "I already pay council tax and road tax so I don't really see why I should have to pay to park outside my own home.

"It's all right for people with garages who can get round it, but we don't have that option. Quite often there's nowhere to park on our road anyway, so why should we have to pay for a space that might not even exist?

"I don't mind paying for the second one because I can understand the problems of having multiple cars but having to pay for one is ridiculous.

"They should ditch the policy and not just put it off for a year to keep people happy."

1:39pm Friday 4th April 2008

Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: John, southampton on 3:51pm Fri 4 Apr 08
More importantly - wow shes a FOX :)
Posted by: paul b on 6:17pm Fri 4 Apr 08
She is beautiful
Posted by: Pa King Wong, the Chinese Traffic Warden on 8:19pm Fri 4 Apr 08
I wouldn't mind parking in her space!
Posted by: Rose, Portswood on 2:21pm Sat 5 Apr 08
Belinda is absolutely right - it's a disgrace and just one more example of the Council fleecing its own residents to bring in more money. I remember when the parking permit system was first suggested and we all had to vote on the idea. It was put forward as USER FRIENDLY!! I don't see much sign of User Friendly here!
Thumbs down.
Posted by: Amanda, Soton on 9:02am Sun 6 Apr 08
This is typical of deceitful councils, they hold a survey that conveniently neglects to mention any cost, then try to claim that residents are in favour of being ripped off! I thought councils were supposed to protect the public against such rogues. Who votes for these clowns anyway?
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive
The Daily Echo brings you 1000s of jobs , homes and cars every day
Powered by Powered by Fish4


Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network